Advertisement

December 6, 2015

PRAGUE-19 Supports BVS Implantation During Primary PCI for STEMI Patients

December 7, 2015—One-year clinical and computed tomography angiography outcomes from the PRAGUE-19 trial were published by Petr Widimsky, MD, et al online ahead of print in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions

PRAGUE-19 is an investigation of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) implantation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The prospective, multicenter single-arm study enrolled consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI with intention-to-implant BVS at the University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady in Prague, Czech Republic.

The investigators concluded that the PRAGUE-19 data demonstrated that BVS implantation in STEMI is feasible, safe, and offers excellent 1-year clinical and angiographic outcomes.

As summarized in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 343 STEMI patients were screened during the 15-month enrollment period. There were 70 patients (mean age, 58.6 ± 10.3; 74% males) who fulfilled entry criteria; BVS were successfully implanted in 96% of them. All patients were invited for clinical and computed tomographic angiographic control 1 year after BVS implantation. Restenosis was defined as ≥ 75% area stenosis within the scaffolded segment. 

The investigators found that three events were potentially related to BVS: one in-stent restenosis (treated 7 months after primary PCI with drug-eluting balloon), one stent thrombosis (treated 2 weeks after primary PCI by balloon dilatation—this patient stopped all medications after primary PCI), and one sudden death at home 9 months after primary PCI. Four other patients had events definitely unrelated to BVS. 

Overall, 1-year mortality was 2.9%. Computed tomography angiography after 1 year was performed in 59 patients. All BVS were widely patent, and the binary restenosis rate was 2% (the only restenosis event mentioned above). Mean in-scaffold minimal luminal area was 7.8 ± 2.6 mm2, area stenosis was 20.1% ± 16.3%, minimal luminal diameter was 3.0 ± 0.6 mm, and diameter stenosis was 12.8% ± 11.1%, reported the investigators in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions.

Advertisement


December 7, 2015

DES, DEB, and Balloon Angioplasty Compared in Management of DES ISR

December 7, 2015

DES, DEB, and Balloon Angioplasty Compared in Management of DES ISR


)