Catheter-Based Tricuspid Intervention

A review of current leaflet, annular, and valve replacement device technologies.

By Abdellaziz Dahou, MD, PhD; Juan F. Granada, MD; and Rebecca T. Hahn, MD
 

According to the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines, the only class I indication for functional tricuspid regurgitation (TR) intervention is for severe disease at the time of left heart valve surgery.1 Despite the benefits of concomitant tricuspid repair,2,3 the majority of eligible patients undergoing left heart valve surgery do not undergo treatment of their significant TR, resulting in a large population of patients with increased reoperative mortality.4-7 In addition, an increasing number of high-surgical-risk patients are being treated with transcatheter therapies for aortic8,9 as well as mitral valve disease10 but have worse outcomes due to severe TR.11-13 Isolated tricuspid valve (TV) surgery is rarely performed; however, a clearer understanding of the poor natural history of the disease14-16 has led to an increase in surgical interventions.

The goals of TV surgery are restoration of full leaflet mobility, correction of prolapse, provision of a large leaflet coaptation surface, and annular stabilization.17 The morphologic abnormalities associated with functional TR include: (1) tethering or tenting of the tricuspid leaflets, (2) dilatation of the annulus and/or right atrium, (3) right ventricular dysfunction, and (4) displacement of the papillary muscles.18 Because significant tricuspid annular dilatation may be a better predictor of severe late TR after mitral valve surgery,3,19,20 measurement of the annular diameter has been used as an indication for TV surgery in the absence of severe TR. Significant annular dilatation is defined by a diastolic diameter ≥ 40 mm or > 21 mm/m2 in the four-chamber transthoracic view,3 or > 70 mm on intraoperative inspection.20 Although annuloplasty techniques address this morphologic abnormality, tenting or tethering of the leaflets is a marker for recurrent TR after repair. Tenting areas and volumes correlate with TR severity and with poor outcomes after surgical repair.21-24 If the TV tethering distance is > 0.76 cm or the tethering area is > 1.63 cm2, the use of adjunctive surgical techniques with tricuspid annuloplasty or TV replacement should be considered.17,22,25

Unfortunately, the in-hospital mortality rate for isolated TV surgery is approximately 9%, with no significant improvement over a 10-year study period.26,27 Zack et al also showed that the adjusted in-hospital mortality for TV replacement was significantly higher than for TV repair (odds ratio, 1.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.18–3.09; P = .009).26 Alqahtani et al confirmed that after rigorous propensity matching, TV replacement was associated with significantly higher rates of in-hospital death (12% vs 6.9%; P = .009) and permanent pacemaker implantation (33.7% vs 11.2%; P < .001).27

Given the high in-hospital risk associated with isolated TV surgery, a number of transcatheter devices to treat functional TR are being investigated.28,29 These devices attempt to treat different targets of the TV apparatus (annulus, leaflets, and chordae). Replacement devices are also under investigation.

LEAFLET GRASPING AND SPACERS

Several technologies aiming to reduce the severity of TR by reducing the total regurgitant area are under clinical validation, and we discuss a few of them in the following sections.

TriClip

TriClip (Abbott Structural Heart) is composed of a steerable sleeve and delivery catheter, purposely designed to access the TV. The clip component is the same as in MitraClip (Abbott Structural Heart). Early first-in-human clinical studies validated the potential efficacy profile of the MitraClip device in the treatment of severe TR. The TRILUMINATE trial tested the safety and effectiveness of TV repair using the MitraClip NT device (Abbott Structural Heart). The study included 85 patients at 21 centers in the United States and Europe. Acute device success was 100%. At 30 days, 86.6% had at least one grade reduction in TR, 25% had residual moderate TR, and 28% had mild residual TR. More than 80% of patients were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class I/II at 30 days.30

The recently initiated TRILUMINATE pivotal study aims to validate the TriClip device in improving clinical outcomes in symptomatic patients with severe TR, who are at intermediate or greater estimated risk for mortality with TV surgery. This randomized controlled trial will compare the investigational device (TriClip device) to the control (optimal medical therapy).

Pascal

The Pascal tricuspid valve repair system (TVRS; Edwards Lifesciences) integrates the advantages of leaflet grasping plus the physical properties of a spacer to further reduce the total regurgitant area. The Pascal TVRS is a 22-F system and that has been used to treat 12 patients in an international compassionate use experience. Acute procedural success (TR reduction by 1+ grade) was achieved in 92% of the patients. A feasibility study has been initiated in the United States and is ongoing.

Forma

The Forma TVRS (Edwards Lifesciences) is positioned within the regurgitant orifice, providing surface for the native leaflets to coapt. Early clinical outcomes from the United States FORMA EFS trial and an international compassionate use series have been reported.31 In the FORMA EFS trial, out of 29 enrolled patients, technical success was achieved in 93.1%. All-cause mortality was 6.9% at 30 days and 31% at 1 year. A 31% reduction in TR as measured by vena contracta and 41% reduction of the proximal isovelocity surface area–derived effective regurgitant orifice area (PISA EROA) were observed at 30 days, and these reductions were maintained up to 1 year. Clinically significant improvements in functional status were also observed and maintained at 1 year.

Other Emerging Leaflet Technologies

The Mistral TVRS (Mitralix, Ltd.) consists of an 8.5-F delivery system and a spiral-shaped repair device. The device improves leaflet coaptation by gently grasping chords from two adjacent leaflets and bringing them together. The ongoing first-in-human MERIT study (NCT02948231) is investigating the clinical performance of this device.

Cerclage-TR block technique is being developed academically with funding from the National Institutes of Health for implantation of an artificial leaflet extension at the septal location based on a technological platform designed for mitral regurgitation (MR). This device, while still in an early stage of investigation, may have the potential to treat both MR and TR at the same time.

ANNULAR DEVICES

A number of annular devices are currently being studied or are in preclinical evaluation (Table 1), and some of these are described in the following sections.

Cardioband

The Cardioband TVRS (Edwards Lifesciences) has been successfully used to treat severe functional TR.32,33 Using the surgical incomplete annuloplasty ring as a predicate, the device is an annuloplasty band designed to reduce annular dilatation and improve leaflet coaptation and TR severity. The Cardioband implant consists of a polyester sleeve containing a size-adjustable contraction wire. Under transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) guidance with adjunctive intracardiac echocardiographic (ICE) imaging, anchors are deployed through the sleeve to secure the implant to the annulus. After implantation, the device is shortened by a contraction wire mounted on the Cardioband’s sleeve. Under TEE guidance, the annular reduction (typically in the septolateral dimension) can be adjusted to optimize the final result.

Six-month data from the TRI-REPAIR study were recently published.33 The study included 30 symptomatic patients (mean age, 75.6 years) from nine European centers who had chronic severe functional TR, tricuspid annulus diameter ≥ 40 mm, and systolic pulmonary arterial pressure ≤ 60 mm Hg. Technical success was achieved in all patients and there were no periprocedural deaths or severe major adverse events. At 6-month follow-up, results showed a 50% relative reduction in the PISA EROA (P < .01) and a 28% reduction in vena contracta measurements (P < .12), as well as a significant improvement in functional status as measured by 6-minute walk test and NYHA class (all P < .01). Although many patients achieved a TR grade of moderate or less at 6 months, many others remained with severe or even torrential TR.

The Cardioband TVRS is currently the only CE Mark–approved transcatheter device to treat patients with TR, and it is undergoing further study in an early feasibility study (NCT03382457), which has begun enrollment in the United States.

TriCinch

The TriCinch system (4Tech Cardio Ltd.) ­comprises two components: (1) a stainless steel corkscrew implant to be placed in the anterior annulus of the TV, in proximity to the anteroposterior commissure, and (2) a self-expanding nitinol stent that is deployed below the hepatic region of the inferior vena cava (IVC).34-36 A delivery system is available for each component. Stent implants are available in four different sizes (27, 32, 37, and 43 mm) to allow for IVC oversizing of 30%.36 The anchor and the stent are connected via a Dacron band. A reduction in tricuspid annulus dimension is obtained by applying tension and shortening the Dacron band. The device is implanted via transfemoral venous access under TEE and ICE guidance, as well as fluoroscopic guidance.

Rosser et al evaluated the safety and efficacy of the device in Europe in patients with functional severe symptomatic TR and significant annular dilatation (≥ 40 mm) and who were inoperable or at high risk for standard surgery.36 Initial experience showed that the procedure is reproducible, with an expected implantation time of < 1 hour, and that it is reversible at every step to enhance control and safety. After redesign of the anchor, the Early Feasibility Study of the Percutaneous 4Tech TriCinch Coil Tricuspid Valve Repair System study (NCT03632967) has begun enrollment in the United States.

Iris

The Iris system (Boston Scientific Corporation) is a fully repositionable and retrievable complete ring that can be implanted surgically or via transcatheter on the atrial side of the native tricuspid annulus.37,38 Rotational anchors attach the ring to the annulus at defined intervals.38 The device has a zigzag appearance (like the top of a crown), with the anchors at the lowest points and collars around the hinge points at the crest. Annular reduction is then accomplished by repositioning the collars further down the crest, effectively reducing the distance between the anchors.38 A first-in-human implantation in the mitral position was performed surgically in 2015. Among nine patients who underwent mitral valve repair with the Iris system, two had concomitant tricuspid valve repair, with significant annular reduction and no postprocedural residual TR.39 The device now has an internal channel for an ICE catheter to enhance visualization of anchor deployment. Early feasibility trials are expected by 2020.

TV REPLACEMENT DEVICES

In the presence of marked tethering, typically in association with right ventricular dilatation/dysfunction and with or without pulmonary hypertension, an annular device may not accomplish sufficient reduction in TR and a replacement device may be indicated.

Gate

The Gate valve (NaviGate Cardiac Structures, Inc.) is a transcatheter valve composed of an atrioventricular valved stent, delivery system, compression loading system, and introducer sheath. The conical-shaped valve stent is nitinol alloy, is made in four sizes (40, 44, 48, and 52 mm in diameter), and is intended for native tissue tricuspid annular diameters of 36 to 52 mm. Twelve right ventricular tines grasp the tricuspid leaflets from the right ventricular side. There are 12 right atrial winglets perpendicular to the conical stent and covered by a microfiber polyester cloth designed to provide a seal. The three leaflets and the skirt are made of treated equine pericardium. The delivery system consists of a tip-deflecting catheter designed to go through a 42-F introducer sheath.

More than 40 Gate valves have been implanted in inoperable severe, symptomatic TR patients on a compassionate-use basis. Most of these have been implanted via the transatrial route. Early single-site reports of the compassionate use of the Gate valve have shown that implantation was technically feasible and resulted in a reduction of TR to ≤ 2+.40,41 This TR reduction was associated with right ventricular remodeling, increased cardiac output, and improvement in NYHA functional class in most patients. Further studies are needed to refine patient population selection for this device and to determine long-term outcomes.

Heterotopic Caval Valve Implantation

A feasible alternative to orthotopic approaches (intervention in the site of the TV) is caval valve implantation, which involves the implantation of stent valves in a heterotopic position into the IVC and superior vena cava (SVC). This concept has been investigated preclinically with encouraging results and has been utilized in compassionate use cases.42-46 The objective of heterotopic caval TV implantation is to reduce the reflux of severe TR into the venae cavae and thereby improve symptoms and signs of right heart failure, albeit without affecting the magnitude of TR.35 With the implantation of a one-way valve in the IVC or both the IVC and SVC, the hepatic and renal veins are protected from the transmission of the volume from the right ventricle.28,29,42,43 As a consequence, the venous pressure decreases and the difference in arteriovenous pressure increases, which may result in improvement in renal and hepatic functions.

From a technical perspective, the large and variable diameters of the IVC and SVC and the length of the landing zone between the hepatic veins and inferior cavo–right atrial junction are major challenges.28,35 Two valve prototypes, the self-expandable TricValve (P&F Products Features GmbH in cooperation with Braile Biomedica) and the balloon-expandable Sapien 3 and XT valves (Edwards Lifesciences) have been tested in proof-of-concept trials for this purpose in patients who are inoperable or at a high surgical risk for TV replacement.35 The TRICUS study (NCT03723239) is currently enrolling and seeks to determine the safety and efficacy of the TricValve device.

The TRICAVAL trial (NCT02387697) randomized patients to optimal medical treatment versus transfemoral implantation of the Sapien XT valve into the IVC. The trial was terminated early for safety concerns after enrollment of 28 patients and the future of this solution to TR is unclear.

CONCLUSION

As our understanding of the impact of TR on outcomes expands, the limitations of the current treatment guidelines, as well as the high mortality associated with isolated TV surgery, highlight the need for less invasive options for this undertreated population. A number of transcatheter therapies are currently under investigation with the hope of providing an efficacious, safe option for treatment of this high-surgical-risk population.

1. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:e57-e185.

2. Tang GH, David TE, Singh SK, et al. Tricuspid valve repair with an annuloplasty ring results in improved long-term outcomes. Circulation. 2006;114:I577-581.

3. Dreyfus GD, Corbi PJ, Chan KM, Bahrami T. Secondary tricuspid regurgitation or dilatation: which should be the criteria for surgical repair? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:127-132.

4. Hornick P, Harris PA, Taylor KM. Tricuspid valve replacement subsequent to previous open heart surgery. J Heart Valve Dis. 1996;5:20-25.

5. Mangoni AA, DiSalvo TG, Vlahakes GJ, et al. Outcome following isolated tricuspid valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001;19:68-73.

6. Kwon DA, Park JS, Chang HJ, et al. Prediction of outcome in patients undergoing surgery for severe tricuspid regurgitation following mitral valve surgery and role of tricuspid annular systolic velocity. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:659-661.

7. Antunes MJ, Barlow JB. Management of tricuspid valve regurgitation. Heart. 2007;93:271-276.

8. Thourani VH, Kodali S, Makkar RR, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis. Lancet. 2016;387:2218-2225.

9. Holmes DR Jr, Nishimura RA, Grover FL, et al. Annual outcomes with transcatheter valve therapy: from the STS/ACC TVT registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66:2813-2823.

10. Boekstegers P, Hausleiter J, Baldus S, et al. Percutaneous interventional mitral regurgitation treatment using the Mitra-Clip system. Clin Res Cardiol. 2014;103:85-96.

11. Lindman BR, Maniar HS, Jaber WA, et al. Effect of tricuspid regurgitation and the right heart on survival after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves II inoperable cohort. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8;e002073.

12. Ohno Y, Attizzani GF, Capodanno D, et al. Association of tricuspid regurgitation with clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system: 30-day and 12-month follow-up from the GRASP registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imag. 2014;15:1246-1255.

13. Sorajja P, Vemulapalli S, Feldman T, et al. Outcomes with transcatheter mitral valve repair in the United States: an STS/ACC TVT registry report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:2315-2327.

14. Nath J, Foster E, Heidenreich PA. Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:405-409.

15. Topilsky Y, Nkomo VT, Vatury O, et al. Clinical outcome of isolated tricuspid regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:1185-1194.

16. Lee JW, Song JM, Park JP, et al. Long-term prognosis of isolated significant tricuspid regurgitation. Circ J. 2010;74:375-380.

17. Antunes MJ, Rodriguez-Palomares J, Prendergast B, et al. Management of tricuspid valve regurgitation: position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Groups of Cardiovascular Surgery and Valvular Heart Disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:1022-1030.

18. Dahou A, Levin D, Reisman M, Hahn RT. Anatomy and physiology of the tricuspid valve. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:458-468.

19. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F, et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012): the Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;42:S1-44.

20. Van de Veire NR, Braun J, Delgado V, et al. Tricuspid annuloplasty prevents right ventricular dilatation and progression of tricuspid regurgitation in patients with tricuspid annular dilatation undergoing mitral valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141:1431-1439.

21. Sagie A, Schwammenthal E, Padial LR, et al. Determinants of functional tricuspid regurgitation in incomplete tricuspid valve closure: Doppler color flow study of 109 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:446-453.

22. Fukuda S, Song JM, Gillinov AM, et al. Tricuspid valve tethering predicts residual tricuspid regurgitation after tricuspid annuloplasty. Circulation. 2005;111:975-979.

23. Sukmawan R, Watanabe N, Ogasawara Y, et al. Geometric changes of tricuspid valve tenting in tricuspid regurgitation secondary to pulmonary hypertension quantified by novel system with transthoracic real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20:470-476.

24. Park YH, Song JM, Lee EY, et al. Geometric and hemodynamic determinants of functional tricuspid regurgitation: a real-time three-dimensional echocardiography study. Int J Cardiol. 2008;124:160-165.

25. Raja SG, Dreyfus GD. Basis for intervention on functional tricuspid regurgitation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;22:79-83.

26. Zack CJ, Fender EA, Chandrashekar P, et al. National trends and outcomes in isolated tricuspid valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:2953-2960.

27. Alqahtani F, Berzingi CO, Aljohani S, et al. Contemporary trends in the use and outcomes of surgical treatment of tricuspid regurgitation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e007597.

28. Rodes-Cabau J, Hahn RT, Latib A, et al. Transcatheter therapies for treating tricuspid regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1829-1845.

29. Hahn RT. State-of-the-art review of echocardiographic imaging in the evaluation and treatment of functional tricuspid regurgitation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:e005332.

30. Nickenig G. Percutaneous edge-to-edge repair for tricuspid regurgitation: primary outcomes from the TRILUMINATE clinical trial. Presented at EuroPCR 2019; May 21, 2019; Paris, France.

31. Perlman GY, Dvir D. Treatment of tricuspid regurgitation with the Forma repair system. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018;5:140.

32. Kuwata S, Taramasso M, Nietlispach F, Maisano F. Transcatheter tricuspid valve repair toward a surgical standard: first-in-man report of directannuloplasty with a Cardioband device to treat severe functional tricuspid regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:1261.

33. Nickenig G, Weber M, Schueler R, et al. 6-month outcomes of tricuspid valve reconstruction for patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:1905-1915.

34. Latib A, Agricola E, Pozzoli A, et al. First-in-man implantation of a tricuspid annular remodeling device for functional tricuspid regurgitation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:e211-214.

35. Rodés-Cabau J, Taramasso M, O'Gara PT. Diagnosis and treatment of tricuspid valve disease: current and future perspectives. Lancet. 2016;388:2431-2442.

36. Rosser BA, Taramasso M, Maisano F. Transcatheter interventions for tricuspid regurgitation: TriCinch (4Tech). EuroIntervention. 2016;12:Y110-Y122.

37. Taramasso M, Maisano F. Transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention: state of the art. EuroIntervention. 2017;13:AA40-AA50.

38. Hahn RT. Current transcatheter devices to treat functional tricuspid regurgitation with discussion of issues relevant to clinical trial design. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;6:240-247.

39. Rogers J. Transcatheter tricuspid valve therapies 5: Millipede. Presented at: 2016 Transcatheter Therapeutics annual meeting; November 1, 2016. Washington, DC.

40. Asmarats L, Dagenais F, Bedard E, et al. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement for treating severe tricuspid regurgitation: initial experience with the NaviGate bioprosthesis. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:1370.e5-1370.e7.

41. Hahn RT, George I, Kodali SK, et al. Early single-site experience with transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:416-429.

42. Lauten A, Ferrari M, Hekmat K, et al. Heterotopic transcatheter tricuspid valve implantation: first-in-man application of a novel approach to tricuspid regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1207-1213.

43. Lauten A, Doenst T, Hamadanchi A, et al. Percutaneous bicaval valve implantation for transcatheter treatment of tricuspid regurgitation: clinical observations and 12-month follow-up. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:268-272.

44. Laule M, Stangl V, Sanad W, et al. Percutaneous transfemoral management of severe secondary tricuspid regurgitation with Edwards Sapien XT bioprosthesis: first-in-man experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1929-1931.

45. Lauten A, Figulla HR, Willich C, et al. Percutaneous caval stent valve implantation: investigation of an interventional approach for treatment of tricuspid regurgitation. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:1274-1281.

46. Figulla HR, Webb JG, Lauten A, Feldman T. The transcatheter valve technology pipeline for treatment of adult valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2226-2239.

Abdellaziz Dahou, MD, PhD
Columbia University Medical Center
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
Associate Medical Director, Echocardiography Core Laboratory
Cardiovascular Research Foundation
New York, New York
adahou@crf.org
Disclosures: None.

Juan F. Granada, MD
Columbia University Medical Center
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
Cardiovascular Research Foundation
New York, New York
jgranada@crf.org
Disclosures: None.

Rebecca T. Hahn, MD
Columbia University Medical Center
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital
Cardiovascular Research Foundation
New York, New York
rth2@cumc.columbia.edu
Disclosures: Speaker for Boston Scientific Corporation, Baylis; speaker for and consultant to Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, Philips Healthcare, Siemens Healthineers; consultant to 3Mensio, Medtronic, NaviGate Cardiac Structures, Inc.; Chief Scientific Officer for the Echocardiography Core Laboratory at the Cardiovascular Research Foundation for multiple industry-sponsored trials, for which she receives no direct industry compensation.

 

Contact Info

For advertising rates and opportunities, contact:
Craig McChesney
484-581-1816
cmcchesney@bmctoday.com

Stephen Hoerst
484-581-1817
shoerst@bmctoday.com

Charles Philip
484-581-1873
cphillip@bmctoday.com

About Cardiac Interventions Today

Cardiac Interventions Today (ISSN 2572-5955 print and ISSN 2572-5963 online) is a publication dedicated to providing comprehensive coverage of the latest developments in technology, techniques, clinical studies, and regulatory and reimbursement issues in the field of coronary and cardiac interventions. Cardiac Interventions Today premiered in March 2007 and each edition contains a variety of topics in a flexible format, including articles covering various perspectives on current clinical topics, in-depth interviews with expert physicians, overviews of available technologies, industry news, and insights into the issues affecting today's interventional cardiology practices.